Essay info
Contact us
Toll-free for US only: 1-866-509-5959 Order custom essays:
Instant Quote
Type of work:
275 words/page
Price: $0
Make an order
Our Prices
14 days per page
10 days per page
6 days per page
3 days per page
2 days per page
24 hours per page
12 hours per page
6 hours per page
3 hours per page
Note: The prices are given for High School academic level. Please, visit "Prices" page for the detailed prices.
Similar essays
Write my essay on
"A Critical Review“The Microsoft Monopoly: The facts, the law and the remedy”"
A Critical Review“The Microsoft Monopoly: The facts, the law and the remedy”
Adriana Alvarez
Microsoft has an extremely large market share in the personal operating system market. To some extent, Microsoft is a typical sample of monopoly. Jeffrey A. Eisenach and Thomas M. Lenard, in their article "The Microsoft Monopoly: The facts, the law and the remedy" (2000), assert that Microsoft has a monopoly, has engaged in anticompetitive behaviors, has harmed consumers and violated the law. They analysis the factual evidence and conclude two remedies which would solve this problem and best serve consumers. The objective of this article is to inform the reader that how harmful Microsoft monopoly is, and how necessary to change this situation as soon as possible. Although Jeffrey A. Eisenach and Thomas M. Lenard 's article is well organized, interesting and thought provoking, it seems that there is a bias against Microsoft, overuse other scholar's opinions, some points of view lack evidences. This essay will present a summary of the article and discuss the positive and negative characteristics.

To begin with, authors introduce a Microsoft antitrust case and a debate between Judge Jackson and Microsoft's defenders. In the following, they respectively analyze "the facts", "the law" and "the remedy" of this case. In the part of "the facts", authors quote Judge Jackson's "three facts" to help audiences understand how Microsoft monopolies the software market and why it has harmed consumers. Next, in the part of "the law", they introduce Judge Jackson's conclusion of the law and damn to Microsoft's conduct. After that, authors give two possible solutions respectively named conduct remedies and structural remedies. At the same time, they explain how do these two remedies work and rebut Microsoft defenders' opposite arguments. Finally, authors conclude that they prefer the structural remedy, because it would end the Microsoft monopoly, end the threat of government regulation and obviate the need for further...

Please note! This is not an example of text written by our writers! is a database of essays that were collected at open web resources. You can use them at you own risk following the citation rules below.

But we recommend you to order a custom plagiarism-free essay written just for you from one of our writers. Place an order, add your paper details and enjoy the results! You can keep in touch with your writer, check the draft of your paper and send your order for revision for free. If you are hesitating to place an order – just ask for a quote!
If you want to use this essay follow the citation rules below:
"A Critical Review“The Microsoft Monopoly: The facts, the law and the remedy”." Sep 25, 2018
View full text
essay on A Critical Review“The Microsoft Monopoly: The facts, the law and the remedy”
4 (962 words)
Plagiarism level of this essay is: 100%
Order this essay written from scratch Right Now!
Hi! "A Critical Review“The Microsoft Monopoly: The facts, the law and the remedy”" is a topic for my term paper. Can you write my paper for me?
Stlealr work there everyone. I'll keep on reading.
Leave Your comment
Enter symbols below:
Captcha Image