Results: 1-10 of total 579
(25 results)
Social Issues
(74 results)
(31 results)
(29 results)
(15 results)
(24 results)
(102 results)
(4 results)
(62 results)
(36 results)
(37 results)
(5 results)
Capital Punishment
(1 result)
(22 results)
(1 result)
(2 results)
Art History
(2 results)
Book reviews
(5 results)
(14 results)
(7 results)
(28 results)
(8 results)
(1 result)
Political Science
(7 results)
(2 results)
(3 results)
(6 results)
(1 result)
(7 results)
(1 result)
(1 result)
(1 result)
(2 results)
(1 result)
(2 results)
(2 results)
(4 results)
Scarlet Letter
(1 result)
(1 result)
Great Gatsby
(1 result)
American History
(1 result)
Gun Control
Contact us
Toll-free for US only: 1-866-509-5959 Order custom essays:
Instant Quote
Type of work:
275 words/page
Price: $0
Make an order
Our Prices
14 days per page
10 days per page
6 days per page
3 days per page
2 days per page
24 hours per page
12 hours per page
6 hours per page
3 hours per page
Note: The prices are given for High School academic level. Please, visit "Prices" page for the detailed prices.
Similar searches
Cloning can be defined as a group of individuals produced asexually from a sexually produced ancestor. The genetics, a branch of biology concerned with natural development and the study of hereditary genes, is used to develop one biotic individual from another. Although this method is not yet developed, it has been considered for usage in the future. Cloning has many distinct advantages and disadvantages, which need to be explored further. There are many advantages that come from this complex technology. Possibly, cloning will be able to advance the medical field in the near future. The medical field can become stronger throughout the use of genetic engineering; which someday could create amazing possibilities for our world. Another extremely useful application of cloning technology would be the cloning of tissues or organs for the body. With this we would not only be able to cure suffering and dieing humans but also expand their lifetime. The medical and scientific communities are currently researching the development of genetically engineered organs in animals for transplanting them into humans. This would eliminate the rejection factor normally associated with the transplant. Scientists have grown replacement bladders and implanted them into dogs. The researchers grew bladder cells and seeded then onto a bladder shaped mold, which formed an organ, within six months the bladders were fully functioning. Even though the tests were not essential, they showed the possibilities for humans who have lost their bladders due to an illness such as cancer. Cloning also shows that cells can be used to repair organs. Scientists at the American Company, say that human cardiac patients could have their hearts repaired with patches cloned from their own cells. This technique draws cloning another step towards creating human clones. As our population grows larger it seems inevitable that we destroy more natural...
pages: 3 (words: 798)
comments: 1
added: 02/06/2012
A clone is defined as a cell; group of cells, or organisms that are descended from a single original cell. Scientist Ian Wilmut can be credited with cloning the first mammal, Dolly the sheep, in February of 1997. From that point on ethical issues on cloning began to erupt. Many people are against cloning; then again many people are for human cloning. I am personally not against human cloning and feel that human cloning should be explored. There are many misconceptions of human cloning today. One misconception according to Herbert, Sheler, and Watson is that, "A human clone would not be an exact copy of the person who provided its DNA, but rather would be sort of delayed identical twin, as much as a separate individual as any twin." This is an argument against human cloning and many argue this quote in their favor say that parents who wish to clone a deceased child will end up with a second child who appears to look like the first child yet differ in personality. Parents could possibly be traumatized and become depressed when they come to realize that their second is not an exact replica of the first born. Yet Ronald Bailey goes against this idea in his article "Research into Human Cloning Should Not be Banned". He states, "What would a clone be? Well, he or she would be a complete human being who happens to share the same genes with another person. Today, we call such people identical twins. To my knowledge no one has argued that twins are immoral. Of course, cloned twins would not be the same age. But it is hard to see why this age difference might present an ethical problem--or give clones a different moral status." Lee Silver from the article "Human Cloning is Ethical"...
pages: 3 (words: 684)
comments: 1
added: 03/16/2011
INTRODUCTION I chose to do my report on cloning, or genetic engineering. Cloning is the technique of producing a genetically identical duplicate of an organism by replacing the nucleus of an unfertilized ovum with the nucleus of a body cell from the organism. Some people agree with this type of reproduction, where others do not agree with it and wish that it could be banned. Genetic engineering was first originated in the late 1960's and early 1970's. But the first experiments were not performed until the early 1990's when scientists began to experiment with the smallest human chromosomes, the Y chromosome and chromosome 21. They were broken down into different smaller parts so that the scientists could reproduce the parts in large quantities. Genetic reconstruction is being used to test and see if a baby is going to develop a hereditary disease that a parent might have passed on to the child. If it shows that the child is going to have this disease, reconstruction enzymes are used to cut apart the DNA of the parents, and the DNA pattern of cells from the fetus is compared. In many situations, the status of the fetus can be determined. As of right now, this process is applicable to thalassemias, Huntington's disease, cystic fibrosis, and Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. Another good discovery of genetic engineering was the discovery of oncogenes. Oncogenes are genes that play a specific role in causing some cancers. These genes could not have been discovered any other way than genetic engineering. In the future, scientists hope to be able to go in a cut out the oncogenes to try and prevent some cancers. Genetic engineering is being used many different ways to help better our lives. In my paper, I will describe the many different ways genetic engineering and cloning...
pages: 13 (words: 3540)
comments: 1
added: 07/06/2011
Topic: The ethics of human cloning Specific Purpose: My goal for this speech is two-fold. First, I desire to encourage my audience to think about the ethics of human cloning and to form an opinion of their own. Second, and for those who have an opinion already, I hope to create a modification in my audience's attitude so that they may consider the side of the human cloning debate for which I stand: an advocate of human cloning. Central Idea: Although there are risks involved in human cloning, the possible benefits greatly out weigh the possible costs. Pattern of organization: Topical (persuasive) Introduction I. What have you heard? A. "Some people see things as they are and say why, I see things that never were and say why not." B. This famous quote by George Bernard Shaw underlies one of the hottest debates covered by newscasts today: human cloning. C. Modern technology has allowed us to clone animals. Many of these animals are mammals. If we can clone mammals and human beings are mammals, then surely, in time, we can clone human beings. D. This afternoon I am going to answer the question "Why?" – as in why we should clone humans, and I hope that by the end of this speech you will find no answer to the question "Why not?" (Connective: Let's look first at why human cloning has become such a hot topic of discussion…) Body I. What is the problem? A. One of the reasons that human cloning has become such a heated debate is because it interferes with the individual beliefs of each and every human being. 1. Human cloning contributes to the age-old debate of science vs. religion. a. Are there any moral and theological limits to technology? b. If we can clone a human being, should we? 2. The United States of America is such a great "melting pot," and it is absolutely impossible to make everybody happy. B....
pages: 5 (words: 1285)
comments: 0
added: 01/08/2012
Technology has come a long way over the past century. There is an advance in medicine, equipment to help people with their everyday needs, and faster communication. Everyday someone is trying to improve or help society with inventions and discoveries. Scientists have been experimenting with the ability to clone since 1962, when John Gurdon claimed to have cloned frogs from adult cells. The next surprising outbreak in cloning was in 1996 when scientists successfully cloned an offspring from adult sheep cells. Now scientists want to move on to larger experiments in cloning. In 1997, Richard Seed announced his plans to clone a human. Human cloning is a controversial topic which is being argued in our nation's capital (John's Cloning Page). There are mixed views about human cloning and whether it will be good for society or bad. The sources that I found express different opinions about human cloning. Each source gives a great deal of reasons to support their view about human cloning. When I began my research I wanted to make sure I was using reliable resources. I decide to visit the official site online for human cloning. The website seems extremely reliable because on the top of the homepage, the creators state, " is the official site in support of human cloning technology. The Human Cloning Foundation has been determined to be a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and all donations are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law" ( This quote immediately caught my eye when I began scanning the page. By stating what kind of organization the webpage is for and how they are operated makes the researcher feel a little more comfortable when gathering information from this site. The site supplies the researcher with a numerous amount of links to help him understand everything there is to know about...
pages: 4 (words: 879)
comments: 1
added: 07/02/2011
In the realm of medical science, there have been and still are many different technological innovations, which lead to great controversy. Things such as abortion, artificial insemination, and even certain kinds of surgery that have proven successful for humanity have gone through much debate. Today, one of the hottest topics to be debated, just so happens to be one of these technological innovations. It is something that people tend to be either fore or against and not in-between. Human cloning, this current break through, is being discussed worldwide and is advancing in its use everyday. Many people, including myself, disagree with most types of cloning because it contradicts their beliefs. Because there still are those that push for its advancement it truly is becoming one of the largest controversies of our time. Thorough out my life, I have developed beliefs that are based on what the Bible teaches us. Because of this, I have to disagree with any practice of human cloning. The cloning of animals and plants on the other hand do not bother me and I see nothing wrong with it. Since we are given the domain in the Bible to rule over the world, which are the animals and plants, the cloning of these things to help humanity survive is all right. The video that was presented in class on cloning gave many different world-views in support on cloning and only a few in opposition of it. The one argument that I did agree with was from Russell Saltzman, a Lutheran reverend. The reverend could have benefited from therapeutic cloning but refused to take part in this sort of technology because of his beliefs taken from the Bible. He argued that in creating the embryo for this, he would be creating a life and then killing it simply for...
pages: 3 (words: 672)
comments: 1
added: 10/12/2011
Human cloning becomes more and more controversial now that the scientists are technologically ready to undertake this revolutionary step in human reproduction. There are many proponents of human cloning who find justifying arguments. They argue that cloning would alleviate trauma and grief for people who lost someone close in an accident because a "replacement" could be created. Further, infertile couples could use cloning techniques to have children. Next, human cloning would terminate genetic faults in people. Additionally, people who want an image of them to live on forever could preserve their life in clones of themselves. Human cloning in general would contribute to research and experiments on human body and scientific limits. Cloning could also become a new source of economic activity. The arguments to the contrary include equally strong ideas. First, cloning humans is ethically questionable because it may have unpredictable social and psychological consequences. Second, a cloned individual would be genetically identical to the cloned individual, but she/he would not be the same as the cloned individual to replace her/him. Moreover, cloning is illegal in the US. The opponents of human cloning insist that no scientist should do everything she/he CAN do. There are certain ethical boundaries for scientists to abide by. They should not do things to harm other people in any way especially that scientists' knowledge and abilities could be dangerous to human race. A situation who-CAN-do-what could create an unhealthy competition among the scientists, who would care more about their personal benefit and fame than about the benefit of humanity. In the light of controversy on human cloning, past and current findings in this field elicit many ethical questions for future research. The idea of human cloning takes its beginnings from animal cloning. The procedure of cloning is wildly understood as extracting a nucleus from one...
pages: 9 (words: 2433)
comments: 0
added: 12/14/2011
Since the birth of dolly- the famous cloned sheep- in 1997, and the world has still been struggling into several social, scientific, and religious debates regarding cloning. Dolly's cloning created a spontaneous reaction that exposed the idea of human cloning. Therefore, different authorities with diversified perspectives lead to numerous hesitative opposing points of view based on their background of moral and ethical images. These images are not just statements that are considered as virtues or rights; however, they are rather images of how virtues and rights stick together, and what they may perform to influence our positions in life (Burley, 1998, p.4). Such images construct the nucleus for the debate regarding human cloning in its miscellaneous perspectives. In addition to the issues of morality and ethics, the confusion of science with technology reveals, where they both must work coherently for the sake of humanity to serve the common good and not just for achieving mere individual desires and self-aggrandizing imperatives (Rantala, 1999, p.122). According to human cloning, the process acquires transferring DNA from the nuclei of a living cell into a human ovum, and then this embryo will be implanted into a woman's uterus (CNN, Jones). So, we are able to implement human cloning, but is it accurate to do it? Will there be any side effects that will threaten the world? Does implementing human cloning counter our social, scientific, and religious perspectives? In reply to the above questions, Dr. Panos Zavos, an American researcher, ignores all threats and states, "We intend to do this, and we do intend to do it right" (CNN, 2001 Jones). As a matter of fact, Dr. Zavos along with Dr. Severino Antinori, an Italian professor, intend to clone a human in November 2003. Regarding the mentioned issues, CNN TV made in February 1997 and in February 2001...
pages: 7 (words: 1820)
comments: 0
added: 12/14/2011
"A Chip Off the Old Cell" The actual process of cloning is nothing new. It began in the 1970s with the cloning of frogs. Scientists have cloned plants and animals for years since then. Recently, there have been continuing controversies regarding the process of human cloning, and whether or not our society has a use for it. On July 5,1996, scientist Ian Wilmut (after 277 attempts), created first born cloned mammal which was a healthy lamb by the name of "Dolly". A process called somatic nuclear cell transfer accomplished this task. For example, a cell is first taken from a donor female, then an unfertilized egg is taken from a second female, DNA from the cell is removed and transferred to the egg which is implanted into a surrogate mother, and finally the resulting baby is genetically identical to the original donor(The Human Cloning Process). Since this extraordinarily scientific breakthrough occurred there have been many reactions. March of 1997, President Clinton issued a moratorium banning the use of federal funds for human cloning for the following five years, giving the National Bioethics Board significant time to assess the risks of cloning and study ethical and social impacts. September of that same year, 64,000 biologists and physicians signed a voluntary 5-year moratorium on human cloning. January 1998, nineteen European nations sign a ban, and the FDA announces its authority to regulate human cloning (The Human Cloning Process). The controversy is still ongoing, but has made some progress within the recent years. People who are against human cloning state many logical concerns of its effectiveness and need in our society. The fear of the unknown takes a toll on the human psyche particularly on this issue. Lewis Thomas (1913-1993), a physician and scientist, states that his reasons for opposing human cloning is because "there...
pages: 4 (words: 985)
comments: 2
added: 06/27/2011
Banning on human and organ cloning is posing a problem on those educated ones in academia. Researcher and scientist Dr. Ian Wilmut has successfully cloned a sheep, and has gathered from this experiment evidence that strongly proves that human and organ cloning could be performed – safely and effectively. Unfortunately, our government has almost immediately banned such cloning in this country. Did they realize the benefits of such a discovery? Perhaps they simply believe that it is some sort of unethical, immoral experiment that is not beneficial to our society. Perhaps they should take a closer look at exactly what these researchers have derived from years of experimenting. In this paper, I will propose a possible plan to persuade our government to take another look at human and organ cloning. Many positive benefits could come out of this, and it is our responsibility, for the sake of a healthier future, to push policy makers to change their minds and loosen their grips on such a banning. Cloning of various organisms has been going on for years. This concept of cloning was conceived in 1938, but it was not until 1994 that a method using an embryo was used to clone a cow (Business Week). Much to many people's surprise, the idea of cloning humans is not an aged concept. It is fairly new, but that hardly means that the amount, or rather quality, of research to support safe human and/or organ cloning, is poor. This bioethical issue is quite debatable, and it has caused further debate, especially after the March 4, 1997 banning of the use of federal funds for research leading to human cloning (Time). The government was pressured. Due to time restrictions, they had to make a challenging decision on whether or not to ban human cloning in...
pages: 5 (words: 1299)
comments: 0
added: 01/18/2012
Results: 1-10 of total 579